Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gay Bride of Frankenstein

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (non-admin closure) CTJF83 pride 04:40, 21 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Gay Bride of Frankenstein

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Delete - clear-cut spam written by one of the writers of the article's subject. No reliable sources indicate that this currently amateur production is notable. Speedy denied for some unfathomable reason, prod removed by the article's author. Are You The Cow Of Pain? (talk) 13:42, 14 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Keep There is a significant and independent coverage about this musical, see The New York Times, Sea Coast Online, Wire, Broadway World etc. etc. The subject easily passes our notability guidelines. --Vejvančický (talk | contribs) 13:59, 14 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

@nominator: Please, don't forget to notify editors about your deletion nominations. In this case, you've nominated the article for speedy deletion, you've prodded it, and finally you've created this AfD. All that without a single explaining line on the talk page of a new user. COI or not, this is not very courteous behavior. Btw, the article is not a spam, even the initial version was rather descriptive and informative. Just my opinion. --Vejvančický (talk | contribs) 14:24, 14 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I left a long and detailed note on the article's talk page in response to the article's author. I have no interest in your lectures on courtesy. Are You The Cow Of Pain? (talk) 16:44, 14 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Comment You can find a long list of independent reviews (links included) at the official website of the project. --Vejvančický (talk | contribs) 14:30, 14 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sexuality and gender-related deletion discussions. —Vejvančický (talk | contribs) 14:38, 14 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Keep: Passes WP:N. Joe Chill (talk) 15:34, 14 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Keep per Joe Chill Beyond My Ken (talk) 04:14, 15 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.